On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 07:47:51 -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote: > I think this has been known for a long time. If this was wrong, why > wasn't there any noise by the Toolchain Maintainer?
Ryan, if you're reading this you'll be honest with yourself and realize I'm not flaming! This is not meant as a flame! I mean it, no flames please! This is an honest assessment of the situation. And I mean no offense to Ryan as we are all very busy little bodies... but *clearly*, he has been shirking his duties and doesn't deserve to be listed as current Toolchain Maintainer. I'm sorry, but hanging out on IRC and participating in idle chit-chat doesn't cut the mustard. Participation on lfs-dev is a must. IMHO, the only person lately who has shown the required levels of understanding, drive and commitment, is you Dan. You obviously care quite a lot about LFS. If I were a betting man, my money would be on you for sure :-) Regards Greg -- http://www.diy-linux.org/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
