Jim Gifford wrote:
<snip fixincludes (seemingly unrelated)>
Now for my questions, my answers are in the ()
Do we really want to pursue our own creating of sanitized headers?
(Possbily)
No...absolutely not. It's a PITA. However patching the files (what is
the count now, 4 or 5 files?) that need changes doesn't seem so bad.
What are the known issues agains the released version/cvs? What's been
done so far?
Do we want to wait for LLH? (Could be a long time)
Do we want use 2.4 headers with patches, like the distro's? (NO!, may
loose some 2.6 ABI functionality)
As questioned in another post in this thread, in the past Mariusz has
been very receptive to patches.
I have copied both the LFS-DEV list and Cross-LFS list, this has been a
topic of some questions both in these lists and in IRC
(yes I know, that's why I'm posting this message)
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
