Jim Gifford wrote:
> I think we all have come to realization that LLH headers are not coming 
> out. So I've been checking into how to make these headers. So I'm asking 
> everyone's opinion on this before I pursue this task.
[...]
> Do we really want to pursue our own creating of sanitized headers? 

I don't think that this makes much sense. One of the problems I see in
this area is that everybody and his dog is starting his own little ABI
headers project. There's about a dozen out there which apparently all
have died of lack of manpower.

It would be better to try to get all interested parties together.

There is
 - H. Peter Anvins LinuxABI project (dead) at 
     <http://zytor.com/mailman/listinfo/linuxabi>,
 - Marius Mazurs Linux-Libc-Headers project (slow),
 - Linux-Libc-Kernel-Headers project (unknown, probably dead) at 
     <http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/libc-headers>,
 - recently Kyle Moffett offered to do some work in this area on LKML 
     but the response was rather indifferent, so I doubt much will 
     come out of it,
 - Klibc includes their own copies of sanitized headers,
 - µClibc includes their own copies of sanitized headers and
 - many major distributions include their own copies of sanitized 
     headers.

That's probably several dozen people either willing or being forced to
work on sanitized headers---if only they were working on *one* 
project ...

jwm

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to