Matthew Burgess wrote:
I'd obviously prefer CLFS to follow suit - cross-building and UTF-8
are (or should be) entirely orthogonal concepts. If our adding
support for UTF-8 breaks the CLFS build, then we should work together
to see if an amicable solution is possible.
Matt what I would like to do is hold off until LFS gets more testing
done, then merge. Is that acceptable. There are some outstanding issues
that need to be addressed from what I see from Alex's posts.
--
------
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LFS User # 2577
Registered Linux User # 299986
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
