Jeremy Herbison wrote: > The best argument against it anyhow has been "it breaks jhlfs". >>From the point of view of a common reader: "What the hell is > jhlfs?" Shouldn't the main project be the focus, not one > developer's side project? (No offense intended, Jeremy).
None taken. Personally, I didn't really see the need to bring jhalfs into the discussion at all. Granted, any change (especially a big one like this, or one that removes the linear quality of the book) will affect jhalfs and how it works. But, that's just part of the game, and those interested in jhalfs will have to accept the challenge of how to fix any resultant brokenness. -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
