Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 01/07/06 09:42 CST:

> There have been plenty of opportunities to speak up and say we should or
> shouldn't do this. There was even just a week ago a thread called 'UTF-8
> book is ready for merging'. That was prime opportunity for anyone to
> speak up and give their opinions. In fact several did. Even more
> opportunity arose when the first patch was reverted. I wouldn't call
> that no discussion.

I suppose I mis-worded my response. Though I tried to qualify my
statements with "not that it is bad, mind you". Anyway, the push of
UTF-8 into LFS was unlike *any* other *major* change to trunk. Perhaps
a long time ago, this is how things were done, to just put a patch
into the book that includes *major* changes. But from what I've seen
of LFS is that a branch is created, and then merged into trunk.

Again, not that it really matters, as the change is probably a good
thing (I cannot say for sure if it is or is not, as there is nothing
there that directly benefits me), but it was sort of an unusual way
to incorporate a major change into the book.

-- 
Randy

rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686]
09:44:00 up 104 days, 19:08, 3 users, load average: 0.21, 0.05, 0.18
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to