On 1/5/06, Ryan Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 18:20 -0700, Archaic wrote:
> > People reading this list are expected to be
> > interested in development otherwise there is no reason to read it.
>
> For base development of the book I agree.
>
> For banging on bleeding edge / proof of concept stuff which is either
> not ready for prime time, or not wholly suitable to current LFS book
> development, I disagree.

I don't like the idea of having to monitor one more list to be abreast
of the bleeding edge; I may not want to test it out, but still would
like to see the fun that the bleeding edgers are having :)

--
Tushar Teredesai
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to