On 1/6/06, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, that's right, sorry. I was confusing his message with a reply to > it which suggested it may be more sensible for the maintainers to > concentrate on getting the 2.6.15 headers ready, rather than worry about > the already (relatively) outdated 2.6.14 kernel.
Matt, are you in contact with Mariusz Mazur? I check the llh svn [1] every once in a while and nothing has been touched in two months. He sent this email [2] to the llh-announce list in November about being swamped with work, but nothing's happened since then. Any more information about this? -- Dan [1] http://svn.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/viewsvn/linux-libc-headers/trunk/ [2] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/pipermail/llh-announce/2005-November/000001.html -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
