Archaic wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 11:01:47PM +0000, Ken Moffat wrote:
Ok, so the order in which libraries are loaded, together with a missing
library, can trigger an assertion failure in glibc. "Doctor, it hurts
when I delete this library which has other libraries depending on it."
In the test case the library was removed. In the live scenario there
isn't a library deleted that I can see.
No, there is nothing missing in the live scenario, as proven by using
the LD_PRELOAD workaround. The lib is removed in the testcase only to
trigger the message. Glibc simply should not be fussing about it.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
