Any thoughts Matt about using GCC-4 as the default SVN build compiler? I only ask again as last time I asked it seemed the respondents were positive about the idea. I can't think of anyone that said it was a bad idea. I don't consider your input as a "bad idea" as much as a "careful consideration".
I see now that the ping/ftp/inetutils issue is sort of a non-issue any more now that a patch was sent in which fixes inetutils. Other than that, we have the PAM/Shadow/su issue (sorry for not giving feedback about the -12 update yet, just update LFS and I or DJ will get BLFS in line. Don't ever hold up LFS for something in BLFS, unless it is a major deal) which isn't really an issue as if you type a bad password, what is the difference between an segfault and a message saying your password was bad? :-) There was another issue, let's see.... oh yeah, the cfdisk issue. Not sure about that one, I cannot duplicate it with my partition table the way it is. But from the sounds of things, setting optimization to 0 seemed to fix it for everyone. Am I mistaken on this one? I can say that BLFS is coming along great. The JDK is a biggie, but then, that one has required a different compiler before, so it wouldn't be the first time that the JDK required a downgraded compiler on the system if you want to build it. -- Randy rmlinux: [bogomips 3923.96] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.1] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.5] [Linux 2.6.12.4 i686] 01:07:00 up 8 days, 13:03, 7 users, load average: 0.16, 0.15, 0.08 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
