DJ Lucas wrote these words on 08/14/05 23:47 CST: > Is that yes - I'd like to see a nice green '[ OK ]' when I stop an > already stopped process (the way it is now, which _is_ correct by the > exit status)?
That sucks. > Or is that yes - I'd like to see a yellow 'Warning: not > running [ WARN ]' when I stop it (which also returns 0 as is > required for LSB)? Well, actually, I like this, but since we now have an opportunity to make it "just right", wouldn't it be better to say [ NOTICE ] instead of [ WARN ]? If this is something more than tweaking a string in the functions, then by all means, simply convert my answer to a resounding YES to put it back the way it used to be. However, it seems that making the string change would be easy, and [ NOTICE ] seems better than [ WARN ]. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 23:48:59 up 134 days, 23:22, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.08 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
