Archaic wrote these words on 07/10/05 17:51 CST: > After having been a maintainer of the patches repor for quite some time > now, I am in vehement agreement with Jim that patches that do not appear > in any book or in any hint should *not* be hosted here.
Why? I did not see anything posted by Jim that *explains* why. That's why I'm now asking. I don't see any harm in hosting patches that may not be used in a book or hint. We don't say to use them, we only host them in case someone *may* want to use them. What's the harm in that? -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 22:44:00 up 99 days, 22:17, 2 users, load average: 0.18, 0.22, 0.12 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
