Archaic wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 11:19:14PM +0200, M.Canales.es wrote:
In that case, that is the most common one, to create cross-tools is acceptable
a maybe needed for purity and isolation from the host system. But to have to
cross-compile the full final system look excessive.
I strongly agree with the excessive part.
Yes, me too. I hadn't thought of that before. But I wonder if there's a
way to set the instructions for the final system such that they would
work both if you were cross-compiling or if you were natively compiling.
But then, if you're natively compiling without a chroot I suppose you
lose some of the purity, eh?
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page