On Wednesday 15 June 2005 05:59 pm, David Jensen wrote: > Archaic wrote: > >Now for the sake of current BLFS svn, I see no need to change this in > >6.1, but for future releases I propose the entire build instructions be > >used which would add: > > > >make -C ld clean > >make -C ld LIB_PATH=/tools/lib > > > >Now there is no reason to add this *except* that section 4.5 of the book > >(which explains SBU's) can explicitly state that all commands in grey > >text should be encapsulated in the time command if you want to measure > >the SBU value for that package. Then it leaves little to chance and > >helps keeps all the developers and readers on the same page. > > > >Again, I am proposing this for post-6.1. > > I don't think it's a big thing, BLFS sbu ratios would then be > *slightly* high. > Few would notice. > > -- > David Jensen
Actually, I had already assumed that was part of the SBU Marcus Singleton -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
