Matthew Burgess wrote: > As for flex, it looks > like the maintainers went AWOL again :( > http://sourceforge.net/projects/lex/ currently lists 30 open bugs, and > 11 submitted patches yet to be applied. Maybe it would be prudent to > roll back to 2.5.4a? At least that one manages to get doxygen to > compile successfully!
I see that there have been no updates in over two years. It seems that the most recent version that doesn't break other software is the version we should be using. BLFS does not track all the packages that use flex (or any other LFS package), so figuring out all the packages that need it and putting them in the individual packages would be a major problem for us. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
