Hi,
On 7/07/24 12:05, Thomas Passin wrote:
Again, TiddlyWiki seems the model. In fact... a Leo plug-infor
TiddlyWiki would seem a natural!
I've tried TW at least three times over the years. At first I think
it's wonderful, then little by little I learn again that it's not
quite what I want. Quite an achievement, though.
Regarding TiddlyWiki, I used pretty intensively from 2008-2010 and I
stopped using it as my usage of Leo became more intensive the last
decade and here in the local community went back to a combination
between TW and Lepiter[1], via TiddlyWikiPharo[2].
[1]
https://lepiter.io/feenk/introducing-lepiter--knowledge-management--e2p6apqsz5npq7m4xte0kkywn/
[2] https://code.sustrato.red/Offray/TiddlyWikiPharo/
Being able to extend the application in a "liminal" way from its
frontiers instead of from inside is a better working approach for me. In
the case of the previous combination, by combining TW with Pharo and
Fossil, I have the advantages of all worlds and the disadvantages of
none: A pretty extensible and easy to use Single Page Application in
TiddlyWiki, a powerful interactive computing environment via
Pharo/Lepiter and a simple distributed collaborative system in Fossil.
This has been the most effective way so far to deal with the technology
that is not "quite want I want", while keeping the tech stack simple.
Cheers,
Offray
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/9c39a04c-19e0-4fa5-9efd-51328535b7e3%40riseup.net.
