Have to admit, the “further” had me stumped, but remembered: >From *Alice In Wonderland*:
“Take some more tea," the March Hare said to Alice, very earnestly. "I've had nothing yet," Alice replied in an offended tone, "so I can't take more." "You mean you can't take *less*," said the Hatter: "it's very easy to take *more* than nothing." "Nobody asked *your* opinion," said Alice.” On Saturday, July 6, 2024 at 8:45:47 PM UTC+7 Edward K. Ream wrote: > On Sat, Jul 6, 2024 at 8:14 AM Inspired Mars <inspir...@gmail.com> wrote: > > This thread was about freeing “LeoJS”, but it looks like I waded into an >> area that didn’t seem controversial at all. >> Namely, that the new product was built to replace the old. >> All the past announcements made clear that it was a matter of when, not >> if: >> These are from memory, not verbatim quotes, but should be close enough. >> - LeoJS is the future of Leo >> - Such and such is the “final release” of Leo >> - The Visual Studio Code team has far far greater resources for building >> user interfaces >> Etc. >> And I suggested (and suggest) that sooner is better than later for >> reasons given. >> Now it’s being stated that “this isn’t going to happen”. Well exactly >> what is being planned then? >> If there were ever a time for coy dismissive one liners, that time is >> long past. >> Why create FUD on this project? >> Why build up all this excitement and have sweat poured into building a >> replacement and then not believe in it enough to stand solidly behind it? >> Make it make sense. >> > > I do not wish to discuss these issues further. > > Edward > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/fc83cae1-870e-4679-90e9-ecd185ccbb4dn%40googlegroups.com.
