I assumed that if a challenge came in after day 1, for example, then it could be actioned immediately?
I also assumed that if 1 challenge came in then any others would be ignored or put on hold whilst the first was going through the courts. And if it failed then I also assumed that would be it for any future challenge as it would have legally tested already whether the admin procedures were followed correctly and/or KPMG acted properly. That is why I drew that conclusion. For someone to have decided from the outset to wait until the very last minute suggests to me that they either wanted to cause as much disruption for the club as possible, or that they were hoping for someone else to do the dirty (and costly) work for them. And/or they weren't entirely confident of their chances in court. So, are you saying that it wouldn't have mattered if a challenge came in on day one, KPMG would have waited for the 1 month period before dealing with them (all)? I still don't understand why the plan was to wait until the last couple of hours? Also put this question into context - I see ANY challenge to the CVA as a disruption for the club. The later the challenge is put in, even if nothing could be done until the end of the 1 month window, the less time KPMG/the club has to put together the necessary response, again presumably extending the time it would take to get it sorted out? > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:leedslist- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RickD > Sent: 02 July 2007 12:04 > To: leedslist > Subject: Re: [LU] So let me guess ... > > ----- Original Message ----- > > Anyone know why this creditor group mentioned in the article always > > intended > > to wait for the last few hours before the deadline? > > It is almost as if they want to cause as much disruption as possible > to > > the > > club. > > Why do you draw this conclusion ? Everything would have to wait until > the > end of the 28 day period anyway because another challenge could come in > from > somewhere else. Why does it make any difference to the "disruption" > caused ? > > > _______________________________________________ > the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list > administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions > of contributors. > Leedslist mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
