On 08/05/07, Phill Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can't believe this sh*te I really cant. > > Bates has said that Wise inherited an unfit side where there was backroom > unrest. > > I think ACAS would have a field ady with the fallouts that have gone on > since Wise took over and its pretty clear there was a big falling out on > Wednesdays before kells do.
Why is it clear? Because the YEP (who are hardly on speaking terms with Bates) said so? Or because the allegations were on WACCOE? The same thread breaking this news also had a rebuttal from someone who equally knew someone connected and said that not all reported had happened and implied it may just have been shit stirring. I'd hardly say it's clear. What I think is clear is that nothing is clear - and until it becomes clear (whichever way the ground lays) the only benefit for this continued shit stirring & Bates/Wise/Kelly/Mole/Derry bashing is to add more grist to the mill for our detractors. _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist The Leeds List - "where never is heard a discouraging word..."
