We will be buying horsfield in Jan most likely.

I don’t understand why we would need another striker next season?  If
horsfield does go back in jan and we don’t buy him then we still have that
part of the £2.1 - £3m fee to spend don’t we!

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 03 August 2006 14:00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [LU] RE: Leedslist digest, Vol 1 #365 - 10 msgs

And then next season we need another striker worth £1-2m. Or in 6 months,
when Horsefield goes back to Sheff Utd. The club we sold Hulse to.

Where's the sense in that? 

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Humphries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 03 August 2006 13:50
To: Skinner, Joe CemF; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [LU] RE: Leedslist digest, Vol 1 #365 - 10 msgs


Its not Horsefield vs Hulse is it though.

Its Horsfield + £1.1m (potentially £2m).  

Which at our level is Horsfield + decent midfielder + decent defender (or
whoever).

That is the only reason business would have been done as apparently Hulse
didn't ask to go.


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 August 2006 13:45
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [LU] RE: Leedslist digest, Vol 1 #365 - 10 msgs

Which brings us back to Horsefield/Hulse.

-----Original Message-----



_______________________________________________
the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators 
accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors.
Leedslist mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
oh alright then :-)

Reply via email to