I thought the shot for the second goal was going comfortably wide.  The
Lewis deflection seemed to put some weird side-spin on the ball and it
curved back in towards goal.  It hit the post then hit sullivan which put
some freaky back-spin on the ball, which was just spinning at just the right
angle to take it back into the net.  Had King (or whoever was lurking)
touched the ball he should have been given offside as he was offside when
the initial shot was taken.  However, whether the linesman saw and knew that
is something we will never know.

Basically, that's one of the luckiest goals I think I have ever seen in a
cup final, in terms of ball physics!

That's football, yes, but how can you say that's not good luck?!  At that
stage in the game did they even deserve to score?  They shouldn't even have
had the bloody throw-in which led to the goal.

> The second one - well, yest, it was unusual, but at least the shot was on
> target. If it had gone wide, Watford fans wouls have been saying how
> "Lucky"
> Lewis was with a half attempted block. It's not luck, it's football.
> 


_______________________________________________
the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators 
accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. 
Leedslist mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist

Reply via email to