Yes it does. A goal was scored, it wasn't prevented, end of story.
The problem was the ref blew the whistle before seeing if 'advantage' led to a goal, therefore he couldn't allow the goal, therefore a goalscoring opportunity had been denied, therefore he had no choice but to red card Lehmann. It really isn't that difficult a concept. > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 18 May 2006 21:27 > To: Mark Humphries > Cc: Nick Allen; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [LU] Non-LU:Refs on the list > > he did prevent eto o from scoring. eto o was the last man at the time > he was fouled. now someone picked up the ball and score but that > doesnt mean > that lehman isnt "eligible" for a red card. > > Eric > > On 5/18/06, Mark Humphries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't think so. You can only really red card him for 'preventing a > goal > > scoring opportunity'.. how can that be the case if they scored? > > > > I think he should have allowed the goal and yellow carded Lehman for > > ungentlemanly conduct. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:leedslist- > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Allen > > > Sent: 18 May 2006 10:44 > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: FW: [LU] Non-LU:Refs on the list > > > > > > Absolutely - play advantage and then go back and deal with the > offender > > > > > > Imagine if Henry had shot on goal a defender had handled on the line > and > > > Pires had tucked away the rebound - goal and sending off - has to > be... > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: 18 May 2006 10:32 > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: [LU] Non-LU:Refs on the list > > > > > > > > > Question: if the ref had waited for a couple of seconds before blowing > > > the whistle on Lehmann, and allowed the goal, could he then have sent > > > Lehmann off as well? > > > > > > YOU are the ref! What would you have done? > > > > > > Gaffer. > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list > > > administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions > > > of contributors. > > > Leedslist mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list > administrators > > > accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of > contributors. > > > Leedslist mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list > administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of > contributors. > > Leedslist mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > > _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
