<sigh> Brighton will come bottom of the league and arguably (actually without doubt) they were the better out of the two teams over the 2 legs. Doesn't really work that argument, does it Mark ?
I think if we get promoted it will be piss funny with this clown in charge. Can't wait. --- Mark Humphries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <sigh> > > Taking your assertion he has spent more than anyone > in the league - cant be > arsed to check, he has also sold more. > > Net value of playing squad is a lot lower. > > What if we get promoted Rich, are you prepared to > accept KB as our manager > in the prem league? By your reckoning if he is a > crap manager in this > league, surely you think its even worse having him > as our manager in the > prem? > > In other words, you would have sacked him regardless > of where we finished > this season. Why not say that instead of trying to > justify your opinion of > him? > > For me its all about performance in the league, the > circumstances he has had > to work under and also my expectations after we got > relegated (ie half > expecting us to go down again, and when we didnt, > for this season expecting > us to maybe scrape a playoff place but being > significantly worse than the > top sides). > > Reading have walked away with the league and yet > over the 2 games we were > arguably the better side. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:leedslist- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard > Walker > > Sent: 27 April 2006 13:49 > > To: Tim Leslie > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [LU] RE: Leedslist digest, Vol 1 #103 > - 4 msgs > > > > Well, unless your mates with someone inside the > clubs > > (Preston or Leeds) then you're guess at the > > 'undisclosed fee' for Healy must be just as much a > > guess as the 1-1.15M. > > Anyway, I think it doesn't really matter, all that > > matters is he has spent more than any other > manager in > > the league. If we fail to get promotion then he > should > > be sacked ? Shouldn't he ? Surely nobody can put > up > > with another season like this one. > > > > > > --- Tim Leslie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Also a couple of pedantic notes: Lennon went for > £1M > > > not 6, Robinson went > > > for £2 not 4.5 and why do we keep being told > Healy > > > cost us £1 - £1.15M > > > when infact we got him for £200K in order for > > > Preston to get something for > > > him before he went out of contract??? I don't > doubt > > > we've spent more than > > > anyone this season (Although Healy, Hulse and > Derry > > > were last season > > > were'nt they? Something that should reduce the > 'this > > > seasons buys' table > > > by a good £2.5M.) I think this kind of table is > > > typical of an anti > > > Blackwell stance, weighted (ala Labour Spin > Doctor) > > > in their favour whilst > > > not actually getting to the truth. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>I checked transfers on soccerbase which is > very > > > rarely wrong. > > > > > > > > > > > > Harry Kewell Liverpool £ 5000000 > > > 09-07-2003<< > > > > > > > > > > > > It may be "rarely wrong" but it doesn't tell > the > > > whole story. From this > > > > deal, Kewell trousered a million and his > slimeball > > > agent pocketed two > > > > million. > > > > > > > > In any case, fees tell only a small part of > the > > > story - you need to factor > > > > in wages, agents' fees etc. > > > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list > and > > > the list administrators accept no liability for > the > > > personal views and opinions of contributors. > > > Leedslist mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > > http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________ > > Switch an email account to Yahoo! Mail, you could > win FIFA World Cup > > tickets. http://uk.mail.yahoo.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and > the list administrators > > accept no liability for the personal views and > opinions of contributors. > > Leedslist mailing list > > [email protected] > > > http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > > Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
