On 01/19/2018 01:03 PM, Christian Lamparter wrote:
On Friday, January 19, 2018 9:12:04 PM CET gree...@candelatech.com wrote:
From: Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com>
This will allow us to select the CT IPQ4019 firmware instead if
desired.
Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com>
---
package/firmware/ipq-wifi/Makefile | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/package/firmware/ipq-wifi/Makefile
b/package/firmware/ipq-wifi/Makefile
index 519e8c9..6690248 100644
--- a/package/firmware/ipq-wifi/Makefile
+++ b/package/firmware/ipq-wifi/Makefile
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ define Package/ipq-wifi-default
SUBMENU:=ath10k IPQ4019 Boarddata
SECTION:=firmware
CATEGORY:=Firmware
- DEPENDS:=@TARGET_ipq806x +ath10k-firmware-qca4019
+ DEPENDS:=@TARGET_ipq806x
TITLE:=Custom Board
endef
Wait! I remember talking about this here in the RFC thread:
<https://www.mail-archive.com/lede-dev@lists.infradead.org/msg09621.html>
|Hm, this would break the WIFI in the default configuration for the
|FritzBox 4040 image. Currently it only has a dependency on the
|ipq-wifi-fritz4040. (So it will end up without a firmware-5.bin)
What gives? Are you trying to break the AVM FRITZ!Box 4040 image on purpose?
Of course I'm not trying to break anything. But, I am not sure how to
fix this properly. Does each platform need to specifically enable a firmware
target instead of depending on a DEPENDS statement to make it work?
Is there some other way I can provide an option for two different firmware
binaries?
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
_______________________________________________
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
