2017-10-04 12:54 GMT+02:00 Mathias Kresin <d...@kresin.me>: > 2017-10-04 12:49 GMT+02:00 <pme.leb...@gmail.com>: >> From: Pierre Lebleu <pme.leb...@gmail.com> >> > > ^^^ and here should be an explanation why SERVICE_SET_NAME should be > used in favour of SERVICE_ATTR_NAME. The SERVICE_SET_NAME belongs to enum SERVICE_SET_XXXX, not SERVICE_ATTR_NAME.
> >> Signed-off-by: Pierre Lebleu <pme.leb...@gmail.com> >> --- >> service/service.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/service/service.c b/service/service.c >> index 02a29fa..9c798aa 100644 >> --- a/service/service.c >> +++ b/service/service.c >> @@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ service_handle_set(struct ubus_context *ctx, struct >> ubus_object *obj, >> int ret; >> >> blobmsg_parse(service_set_attrs, __SERVICE_SET_MAX, tb, >> blob_data(msg), blob_len(msg)); >> - cur = tb[SERVICE_ATTR_NAME]; >> + cur = tb[SERVICE_SET_NAME]; >> if (!cur) >> return UBUS_STATUS_INVALID_ARGUMENT; >> >> -- >> 1.9.1 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lede-dev mailing list >> Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
