2017-10-04 12:49 GMT+02:00 <pme.leb...@gmail.com>: > From: Pierre Lebleu <pme.leb...@gmail.com> >
^^^ and here should be an explanation why SERVICE_SET_NAME should be used in favour of SERVICE_ATTR_NAME. > Signed-off-by: Pierre Lebleu <pme.leb...@gmail.com> > --- > service/service.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/service/service.c b/service/service.c > index 02a29fa..9c798aa 100644 > --- a/service/service.c > +++ b/service/service.c > @@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ service_handle_set(struct ubus_context *ctx, struct > ubus_object *obj, > int ret; > > blobmsg_parse(service_set_attrs, __SERVICE_SET_MAX, tb, > blob_data(msg), blob_len(msg)); > - cur = tb[SERVICE_ATTR_NAME]; > + cur = tb[SERVICE_SET_NAME]; > if (!cur) > return UBUS_STATUS_INVALID_ARGUMENT; > > -- > 1.9.1 > > > _______________________________________________ > Lede-dev mailing list > Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
