Paul Oranje <p...@xs4all.nl> writes: > Small addition (the following may be non-obvious to those not involved > in this discussion). Just saw that A_TA does not have renewal (T1) or > rebinding (T2) fields and for that reason cannot suit a use-case like > a IA just for a work shift.
RFC 3315 section 22.5: An IA_TA option does not include values for T1 and T2. A client MAY request that the lifetimes on temporary addresses be extended by including the addresses in a IA_TA option sent in a Renew or Rebind message to a server. For example, a client would request an extension on the lifetime of a temporary address to allow an application to continue to use an established TCP connection. But I'm not convinced temporary addresses fits that use case. In any case, there are existing client implementations of IA_TA (for example ISC dhclient and dibbler) and RFC7721 stable IIDs (for example Linux kernel and NetworkManager). Bjørn _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
