Eric Luehrsen <ericluehr...@hotmail.com> writes: > IP6 SLAAC plus privacy is common. DHCPv6 should be able to provide > the same funciton. This way central IT can maintain integrity and > traceability. However, individual machines will not be easily > placed into a pattern over time by external snooping.
This looks wrong. The "NA" in IA_NA means "non-temporary addresses". You cannot change that without breaking client expectations. You should implement IA_TA if you want DHCPv6 privacy addresses. See section 12 of RFC 3315 (which is referred to by RFC 4941). Bjørn _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
