I don't know if it makes any difference, but insofar as there is an
AirOS 6.0 now
(https://community.ubnt.com/t5/airMAX-Updates-Blog/airOS-6-0-Has-Been-Released/ba-p/1769476)
should we change the strong to something like "v7.0.0-" etc.?
On 3/3/2017 7:51 AM, txt.file wrote:
changes the image version from hardcoded OpenWrt to
$VERSION_DIST. AirOS shows a notification with the image version
during a firmware upgrade.
fixes #582
Signed-off-by: Matthias Fritzsche <txt.f...@txtfile.eu>
---
target/linux/ar71xx/image/ubnt.mk | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/linux/ar71xx/image/ubnt.mk
b/target/linux/ar71xx/image/ubnt.mk
index 7a1fc80..c633ca1 100644
--- a/target/linux/ar71xx/image/ubnt.mk
+++ b/target/linux/ar71xx/image/ubnt.mk
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
# routerboard creates partitions out of the ubnt header
define Build/mkubntimage
-$(STAGING_DIR_HOST)/bin/mkfwimage \
- -B $(UBNT_BOARD) -v
$(UBNT_TYPE).$(UBNT_CHIP).v6.0.0-OpenWrt-$(REVISION) \
+ -B $(UBNT_BOARD) -v
$(UBNT_TYPE).$(UBNT_CHIP).v6.0.0-$(VERSION_DIST)-$(REVISION) \
-k $(IMAGE_KERNEL) \
-r $@ \
-o $@
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ define Build/mkubntimage-split
dd if=$@ of=$@.old1 bs=1024k count=1; \
dd if=$@ of=$@.old2 bs=1024k skip=1; \
$(STAGING_DIR_HOST)/bin/mkfwimage \
- -B $(UBNT_BOARD) -v
$(UBNT_TYPE).$(UBNT_CHIP).v6.0.0-OpenWrt-$(REVISION) \
+ -B $(UBNT_BOARD) -v
$(UBNT_TYPE).$(UBNT_CHIP).v6.0.0-$(VERSION_DIST)-$(REVISION) \
-k $@.old1 \
-r $@.old2 \
-o $@; \
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ endef
define Build/mkubntimage2
-$(STAGING_DIR_HOST)/bin/mkfwimage2 -f 0x9f000000 \
- -v $(UBNT_TYPE).$(UBNT_CHIP).v6.0.0-OpenWrt-$(REVISION) \
+ -v $(UBNT_TYPE).$(UBNT_CHIP).v6.0.0-$(VERSION_DIST)-$(REVISION)
\
-p jffs2:0x50000:0xf60000:0:0:$@ \
-o $@.new
@mv $@.new $@
_______________________________________________
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
