Dear All, I started to contribute to LEDE recently and after the spin-off. When I decided where to port my contribution I considered the "focus on stability and functionality" more interesting than the "bleeding edge functionality", therefore I selected LEDE. Now I understand that a merge is ongoing. Can I ask to the people taking care about the merge how the trade-off between stability and bleeding edge is solved?
In my opinion a coordination/collaboration between the two project is for sure a benefit for both, but having a single product will generate an ambiguous and ineffective trade-off. Why don't keep two product line with different focus on stability and bleeding edge and merge what really make sense for both? At the end the market share will answer if a single product make sense or not. By the way where can I find the minute of the meetings? Bye. _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
