John Crispin <j...@phrozen.org> wrote: > Hi Karl, > > this comment is completely devoid any usefulness. let me help > by rephrasing it to make it useful. > > "Hi community, > > i have noticed that it is common practice to not annotate the > upstream changes properly in commit bumping the git hash of > packages. i feel that it would be much better if we used some > common pattern, such as the "git log --online" output to make > the changes more explicit. this would make the changelog of > trunk more readable. > > b/R" > > let me know if this is what you actually wanted to say. because > it think it would be a good idea and i would support such a new > way of bumping packages.
Sounds lovely, I appreciate your rewording, it's much clearer and to the point than my earlier complaints. Let's hope the community agrees! Cheers, Karl Palsson
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP Digital Signature
_______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
