Hi

comment inline

On 04/10/2016 22:55, Christian Lamparter wrote:
> The commit "generic: ar8216: add sanity check to ar8216_probe"
> (774da6c7a40320a320b28d71291c0e61fcf7bc8a) stated that PHY IDs
> should be checked at address 0-4. However, the PHY 4 was
> never check by the loop. This patch extends the check to be
> similar to the Atheors SDK. It tries all 4 ports and skips
> unconnected PHYs if necessary. If it cannot find any familiar
> PHYs, it will prevent the phy driver from initializing.
> 
> This patch is necessary for the C-60. It doesn't have a
> PHY at port 3, so this caused the check in ar8xxx_is_possible
> to fail. As a result, the ethernet ports on the C-60 didn't
> work.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunk...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  target/linux/generic/files/drivers/net/phy/ar8216.c | 11 +++++++----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/linux/generic/files/drivers/net/phy/ar8216.c 
> b/target/linux/generic/files/drivers/net/phy/ar8216.c
> index 70f4774..3f1e151 100644
> --- a/target/linux/generic/files/drivers/net/phy/ar8216.c
> +++ b/target/linux/generic/files/drivers/net/phy/ar8216.c
> @@ -2113,19 +2113,22 @@ ar8xxx_phy_match(u32 phy_id)
>  static bool
>  ar8xxx_is_possible(struct mii_bus *bus)
>  {
> -     unsigned i;
> +     unsigned int i, found_phys = 0;
>  
> -     for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
> +     for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
>               u32 phy_id;
>  
>               phy_id = mdiobus_read(bus, i, MII_PHYSID1) << 16;
>               phy_id |= mdiobus_read(bus, i, MII_PHYSID2);
> -             if (!ar8xxx_phy_match(phy_id)) {
> +             if (ar8xxx_phy_match(phy_id)) {
> +                     found_phys++;
> +             } else if (phy_id) {
>                       pr_debug("ar8xxx: unknown PHY at %s:%02x id:%08x\n",
>                                dev_name(&bus->dev), i, phy_id);
> -                     return false;
>               }
>       }
> +     if (found_phys == 0)
> +             return false;
>  
>       return true;

        return !!found_phys;

would be enough here

        John


>  }
> 

_______________________________________________
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev

Reply via email to