Am 29.07.2016 um 21:03 schrieb Felix Fietkau: > On 2016-07-29 20:46, e9hack wrote: >> new: >> interface=br-lan >> interface=eth1.3 >> interface=br-guest1 >> interface=br-guest2 >> interface=br-tor >> except-interface= >> except-interface= >> except-interface= >> except-interface= >> except-interface=pppoe-wan >> except-interface= >> >> old from yesterday's build: >> interface=br-lan >> interface=eth1.3 >> interface=guest1 >> interface=guest2 >> interface=tor >> except-interface=tap0 >> except-interface=eth0 >> except-interface=eth1 >> except-interface=eth1.1 >> except-interface=eth0.7 >> except-interface=wan6 >> >> I'm not sure, if br-guest1 or guest1 is correct. The bridge interface >> br-guest1 contains a >> wifi network only, which is setup by 'option network guest1' wireless >> configuration. >> ifconfig shows br-guest1. The same is valid for br-guest2 an br-tor. >> br-guest1 and >> br-guest2 seems to work with both entries in dnsmasq.conf. Currently, I >> can't test br-tor, >> but tor does work. > br-guest1 is correct, since dnsmasq needs to have network devices here, > not network interface configuration names. Most of the except-interface > ones don't work because in the config you're supposed to specify network > interface configuration names instead of mixing them with device names. > > I've pushed a fix to make it ignore invalid entries.
It seems there are some more incorrect entries: dhcp-range=lan,192.168.103.100,192.168.103.199,255.255.255.0,48h no-dhcp-interface=pppoe-wan dhcp-range=guest1,10.1.0.100,10.1.0.199,255.255.0.0,48h dhcp-range=guest2,10.2.0.100,10.2.0.199,255.255.0.0,48h dhcp-range=phone,192.168.200.100,192.168.200.199,255.255.255.0,48h dhcp-range=tor,172.16.0.100,172.16.0.199,255.255.0.0,2h I don't know the use case of the first entry in dhcp-range, since dnsmasq doesn't know anything about network interface configuration names, it seems to be wrong. The no-dhcp-interface entry is completely wrong. Because this provides DNS service on this interface. In my case, it's overwritten by except-interface=pppoe-wan (and the need of interface definitions explicitly). Regards, Hartmut _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
