HI, Could you explain a bit your experimental setup and observation that lead you to the conclusion the high power calibration is causing the device a damage ? I do have 8x CPE510 in our mesh up & running with the high power calibration table with astonishing radio performance and without any problem. So if the version number could be used to differentiate the effected devices, we might be using it. And while I was looking together with Felix for this calibration table adress on the CPE510 under the original firmware, we might just look at such a different version of the CPE510 as well. Second question, for the CPE210, is there also a high power calibration table like “KSEG1ADDR(0x1fff5000)” usable ?
Greetings THomas > On 17 Jun 2016, at 07:49, Alexander Couzens <lyn...@fe80.eu> wrote: > > Hi, > > it turned out the second calibration table (high power) could > damage some devices within the rf part. Even it was tested on hardware, > I guess it depends on the hardware revision *and* the used frequency. > > It means that we have to use the gravelly bumpy way to fix the txgain > and patching the tx gain table for this particular device. > > The calibration table patch bf27ac019c137e7baf90ca6ef0e40945ae871797 > got reverted. > > Best, > lynxis > -- > Alexander Couzens > > mail: lyn...@fe80.eu > jabber: lyn...@fe80.eu > mobile: +4915123277221 > gpg: 390D CF78 8BF9 AA50 4F8F F1E2 C29E 9DA6 A0DF 8604 > _______________________________________________ > Lede-dev mailing list > Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
