On Wed, 22 Jun 2016 09:47:22 +0200 Thomas Hühn <tho...@inet.tu-berlin.de> wrote:
> Could you explain a bit your experimental setup and observation that > lead you to the conclusion the high power calibration is causing the > device a damage ? I do have 8x CPE510 in our mesh up & running with > the high power calibration table with astonishing radio performance > and without any problem. So if the version number could be used to > differentiate the effected devices, we might be using it. And while I > was looking together with Felix for this calibration table adress on > the CPE510 under the original firmware, we might just look at such a > different version of the CPE510 as well. Hi, I'm sorry, that I couldn't provide a more detailed report, because I was in a hurry. Daniel Golle reported a damaged device when using the high power table together with a high frequency (channel 160 / ~5.8ghz). I'm not quite sure this is related, but I want to be safe and reverted the high calibration table patch quickly. > Second question, for the > CPE210, is there also a high power calibration table like > “KSEG1ADDR(0x1fff5000)” usable ? No, it's not usable, because the cpe210 only has 1 calib table. best, lynxis -- Alexander Couzens mail: lyn...@fe80.eu jabber: lyn...@fe80.eu mobile: +4915123277221 gpg: 390D CF78 8BF9 AA50 4F8F F1E2 C29E 9DA6 A0DF 8604
pgpOgd6Z7eb2U.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
