On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 12:13:32 +0100 Graeme Geldenhuys via Lazarus <lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote:
>[...] > Take the Free Pascal CHM help as an example - it is horrific looking. > The fpdoc's HTML output writer was clearly designed for online HTML > usage with popup browser windows and decent CSS support etc. The CHM > conversion of that gives broken links, unsupported features and bad > formatting. Is this a problem of the CHM producer or the CHM viewer? > It just gives the documentation a bad wrap. fpdoc should > have a dedicated CHM output writer. The same can be said for an ePub > HTML output writer (if that ever materializes). Mattias -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org http://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
