> A co-worker suggested a Waveform Chart wired up with the waveform data > type. If each "waveform" has just one point, t0 will act as the X axis > value and you can achieve an irregularly spaced chart. It works! >
Yep. It works for data that is still a function of X, but isn't necesaarily monotonically increasing. I'd hope that this handles most cases where people ask for an XY chart without doing a general f(x,y) and dealing with all of the details. And I know that I probably should have jumped in a couple weeks ago, but the chart is really a graph with lots of optimizations to speed things up. These optimizations are a nightmare to get perfect, which is why there are oddities with grids on dense charts, and even more artifacts when using wide lines or points on dense data. So, eventually, a general X versus Y chart may be added, but it would help if the use cases to help evaluate how often this is needed and the performance numbers were offered up in addition to the gimme-gimme requests. That way it can be compared to the other features in the pipeline. Greg McKaskle
