I seem to have more limitations imposed on me by the monitor than the video card. According to the G550 specs, it has "dual integrated RAMDACs", a 360MHz Primary and a 230 MHZ Secondary. It claims up to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on the main display, but my monitor can't go that fast. Likewise, the secondary should be able to go faster than 85Hz @1024x768, but once again the monitor can't.
So maybe your own limitations aren't the video card? Just something to consider. John Howard >>> Uwe Frenz 02/13/04 10:37AM >>> John, you wrote: > I am using a Matrox G550, and it > works wonderfully! (21",[EMAIL PROTECTED] + 17", [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Thats about or little above the specs, AFAIK. The highres requires a pixel clock of >160 MHz. The video bandwidth of that chips is not far beyond 250 MHz, so the signal quality will not be very impressive. But it works - i use exactly the same resolution on a Nokia 445Xpro. But the second head used to have a much smaller video bandwidth. The producers tend to overstate their product capabilities, e.g. allowing resolutions that do not produce good signal quality - just to have impressive marketing labels. -- Mit freundlichen Gr��en! Greetings from Germany! -- Uwe Frenz ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dr. Uwe Frenz Entwicklung getemed Medizin- und Informationtechnik AG Oderstr. 59 D-14513 Teltow Tel. +49 3328 39 42 0 Fax +49 3328 39 42 99 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.Getemed.de
