Hi Danilo, On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 12:35 +0200, Danilo Šegan wrote: > У чет, 19. 05 2011. у 12:05 +0100, Jelmer Vernooij пише: > > > > For example, there are a fair number of GNOME upstream branches that > > are still in a pre-2a format, making it harder to do daily builds of > > GNOME. > > FWIW, I am surprised that'd be the case for any up-to-date GNOME > branches since GNOME switched to git in April 2009[1], and bzr 2.0 was > out in September 2009[2]. If I remember correctly, Launchpad was on 2a > even before September. Even if not, I suspect most of the GNOME > branches not on 2a are from before git transition. > > Thus, I believe a bunch of those GNOME upstream branches can be safely > purged and new git imports can be established. > > [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.infrastructure/1134 > [2] https://launchpad.net/bzr/2.0/2.0.0 That's a good point; I've registered the git branches for those GNOME projects that still had svn imports as their "development focus" branch.
I guess there isn't much value in keeping those old svn import branches for GNOME around; should I just request they are deleted rather than getting them upgraded to 2a? That should also bring the number of CSCVS SVN import branches down quite a bit. I'll file a RT about getting the other svn/git/hg branches upgraded to 2a. Cheers, Jelmer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
