Hi Jelmer, all, У чет, 19. 05 2011. у 12:05 +0100, Jelmer Vernooij пише: > > For example, there are a fair number of GNOME upstream branches that > are still in a pre-2a format, making it harder to do daily builds of > GNOME.
FWIW, I am surprised that'd be the case for any up-to-date GNOME branches since GNOME switched to git in April 2009[1], and bzr 2.0 was out in September 2009[2]. If I remember correctly, Launchpad was on 2a even before September. Even if not, I suspect most of the GNOME branches not on 2a are from before git transition. Thus, I believe a bunch of those GNOME upstream branches can be safely purged and new git imports can be established. [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.infrastructure/1134 [2] https://launchpad.net/bzr/2.0/2.0.0 Cheers, Danilo _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
