Hi, 2014.11.04 17:23, Stanislav Horáček wrote: > And one note to translations in general: it would be very helpful to > update Amagama translation memory to include LO 4.3 - otherwise we > could reintroduce bad translations from elder series (I admit that > using TM in Pootle is always risky since sources of Amagama > suggestions are not shown).
I wonder what installation of AmaGama you are talking about. Is there still a public instance of it which collects all the open-source localizations into one TM? I tried to find it a few days ago, but couldn't. And while this topic is on plate, does anyone think it would be a good idea to run our own instance of AmaGama? I assume having a TM containing only our own strings could help a lot when updating localizations between releases, especially in cases like migration to Glade, where the remain stay 99% the same, and only accesskeys and/or string id's change. My vision is we could feed it with our strings when branching new releases, and integrate it with Pootle to offer suggestions. I assume we could also selectively drop old translations before importing new ones, on a per-request basis. Rimas -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: l10n+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
