2013/10/15 Mateusz Zasuwik <mzasu...@gmail.com> > So how can we prevent our work from this updates? One word could have 3 > different translations and if updating concern all files, there could > appears many new errors. Perspective of eternal correcting the same words > isn't motivating to work. > > How can we an mass and repeatedly compare files from LO 4.0 with 4.1 > version? >
I don't have any One Good Solution. Perhaps you/someone could write a script that downloads files for desired branches (say, 4.0 and 4.1) from Pootle, then runs a local update (from 4.1 templates) on the 4.0 files and compares those with 4.1 files downloaded from Pootle. An immediate problem with this is that strings that have been moved to new files will probably appear lost. Another way would be to work on a local copy (using software with translation memory and a hopefully more reliable update mechanism than Pootle), update the files from templates yourself, and upload the translated files to Pootle as needed. Admittedly that approach could be difficult for larger teams where people have different roles, like translator, reviewer, manager, etc. Of course ideally, someone who can should just fix Pootle... -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: l10n+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
