2011/12/17 Rimas Kudelis <r...@akl.lt> > 2011.12.17 13:55, Sérgio Marques rašė: > >> One thing that would also be useful is the ability of ignore accelerators. >> If one wants to find Open and the word is O~pen, the second won´t appear >> on the search. >> >> This is definitely annoying and contra producing. This feature is a must >> have for search function. What do You guys think about it? >> >> >> I think this is already filed as >>> http://bugs.locamotion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=327 ? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi Rimas >> >> Yes, I´ve already saw this entry but I think that it´s the opposite. The >> title says " Ensure that searching in Pootle *takes accelerators into >> account" *(my bold) >> >> >> With this title I guess (don´t know for sure) that the accelerator must be >> taken in order to achieve results. What I meant was " Ensure that >> searching in Pootle *don´t* take accelerators into account" >> >> >> So when I write Open, O~pen; Op~en and Ope~n appear in search. Or am I >> getting this the wrong way? >> > > I think that bug is about both: searching with an accelerator ("O~pen") > and finding strings with accelerators when searching without them (your > case). That bug needs some noise though, I guess... :) > > > Rimas >
You´re probably right. But can You make that noise ;-) ? I don´t have a locamotion account, so if You could do it I´ll appreciate it. Thanks and regards -- Sérgio Marques -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
