2011.12.17 13:55, Sérgio Marques rašė:
One thing that would also be useful is the ability of ignore accelerators.
If one wants to find Open and the word is O~pen, the second won´t appear
on the search.
This is definitely annoying and contra producing. This feature is a must
have for search function. What do You guys think about it?
I think this is already filed as
http://bugs.locamotion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=327 ?
Hi Rimas
Yes, I´ve already saw this entry but I think that it´s the opposite. The
title says " Ensure that searching in Pootle *takes accelerators into
account" *(my bold)
With this title I guess (don´t know for sure) that the accelerator must be
taken in order to achieve results. What I meant was " Ensure that
searching in Pootle *don´t* take accelerators into account"
So when I write Open, O~pen; Op~en and Ope~n appear in search. Or am I
getting this the wrong way?
I think that bug is about both: searching with an accelerator ("O~pen")
and finding strings with accelerators when searching without them (your
case). That bug needs some noise though, I guess... :)
Rimas
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
