Hi,
Am 11.11.2010 22:02, schrieb Paolo Pozzan:
[cut]
I think that a workflow similar to the OOo one would be more efficient: if
we have a deadline we can organize time much better and at the same time
I think a single big export would be much faster to manage than many
small exports.
Not really, as we had to wait for the last team to do the export. And
some teams ar not working with pootle but committing to git directly.
In general, this is a temporary "workflow" anyway. We definately need to
change this for 3.4.
I think we can do something more continous then.
E.g. :
- translation templates will be updated in git regularely (say every week)
- translation templates will be pushed to pootle
- language team can update their pootle repository from templates at any
time (it's possible through the web frontend or this can be automated as
well)
- translations will be pulled from pootle regularely (also every week)
- translations will be pushed to git then (we may need some indicator
for teams directly working on git).
but this needs to be tested.
André
--
E-mail to l10n+h...@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/l10n/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted
