In the segment descriptor _cache_ the accessed bit is always set
(although it can be cleared in the descriptor itself). Since Intel
checks for this condition on a VMENTRY, set this bit in the AMD path
to enable cross vendor migration.

Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <[email protected]>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/svm.c |   22 +++++++++++++++++++---
 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index 32dafb7..ffaba66 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -793,20 +793,36 @@ static void svm_get_segment(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
        var->db = (s->attrib >> SVM_SELECTOR_DB_SHIFT) & 1;
        var->g = (s->attrib >> SVM_SELECTOR_G_SHIFT) & 1;
 
+       switch (seg) {
+       case VCPU_SREG_CS:
        /*
         * SVM always stores 0 for the 'G' bit in the CS selector in
         * the VMCB on a VMEXIT. This hurts cross-vendor migration:
         * Intel's VMENTRY has a check on the 'G' bit.
         */
-       if (seg == VCPU_SREG_CS)
                var->g = s->limit > 0xfffff;
-
+               break;
+       case VCPU_SREG_TR:
        /*
         * Work around a bug where the busy flag in the tr selector
         * isn't exposed
         */
-       if (seg == VCPU_SREG_TR)
                var->type |= 0x2;
+               break;
+       case VCPU_SREG_DS:
+       case VCPU_SREG_ES:
+       case VCPU_SREG_FS:
+       case VCPU_SREG_GS:
+       /*
+        * The accessed bit must always be set in the segment
+        * descriptor cache, although it can be cleared in the
+        * descriptor, the cached bit always remains at 1. Since
+        * Intel has a check on this, set it here to support
+        * cross-vendor migration.
+        */
+               if (!var->unusable) var->type |= 0x1;
+               break;
+       }
 
        var->unusable = !var->present;
 }
-- 
1.5.2.2


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to