I'm curious as to whether his engine had a Force One front bearing?

On Sun, Mar 3, 2024, 11:09 AM Larry Flesner via KRnet <krnet@list.krnet.org>
wrote:

>
> On 3/3/2024 6:47 AM, dee david via KRnet wrote:
> > Unfortunately, it is like any mechanical device. It has an MTBF(mean
> > time between failure)
>
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> In my 33+ year Service Technician career with Xerox I worked as a
> liaison between the tech force and Field Engineering for 3 of those
> years.  Too often the accountants had as much say in the design as the
> engineer.  The failure rate on copiers was "failure rate per million
> copies".  If it was determined (guessed) that it would be cheaper to
> repair after failure than to redesign up front no changes were made.
> Unfortunately that cost per failure varies so much between events (
> copier fails, bid proposal not completed, bid lost to competitor,
> customer cancels equipment contract) that the cost of failure can not be
> accurately projected.  Same with engine failure on an airplane only more
> potentially serious consequences, engine failed - safe landing or engine
> failed - all on board killed in crash.  I would claim it to be humanly
> impossible to build a machine with no failure mode but anyone selling a
> produce with known failure mode with unacceptable consequences and does
> not attempt to eliminate those failures is negligent.  Unfortunately,
> most equipment failure modes are determined by customer use.  You
> consider the odds, pay the money, and spin the wheel................
>
> Larry Flesner
>
> --
> KRnet mailing list
> KRnet@list.krnet.org
> https://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet
>
-- 
KRnet mailing list
KRnet@list.krnet.org
https://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet

Reply via email to