Yep. On Fri, Nov 3, 2023, 07:00 Myron Freeman via KRnet <krnet@list.krnet.org> wrote:
> And thus the reason for the Free Bird. > > On Fri, Nov 3, 2023, 9:52 AM John Gotschall via KRnet < > krnet@list.krnet.org> wrote: > >> I viewed the agreement as written acknowledgement of existing copyright >> law, with the added restriction of 1 set of plans per plane. >> >> Breach of contract (the agreement to build one plane per plan set) would >> be enforced by civil action taken by the copyright holder and beneficiary >> of that covenant that makes another plan sale eminent (profitable). Where >> breaking the agreement and thereby costing the beneficiary the loss of >> profit from a plans sale is the cause of the damages to the beneficiary. >> >> I am not a lawyer, but that's the impression I got from my interactions >> when I purchased my plan sets. I was OK with those restrictions and so >> accepted the conditions. My other option, I felt, was to not make the >> purchases. >> >> Were I to sell them I would inform the buyer of the covenant, same as I >> would when selling a real estate parcel encumbered by an easement. Who >> would make the attempt to sell without making the buyer aware of >> encumbrances/easements or restrictions? A civil action for damages >> resulting from behavior like that seems like a slam dunk in my (non lawyer) >> opinion. >> >> There are likely ways to get around it, ask your lawyer. But why? Maybe >> the plans are hard to find, but there are sets out there. Just like rare >> coins and lake la-4s. >> >> jg >> >> >> >>> >>> -- >> KRnet mailing list >> KRnet@list.krnet.org >> https://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet >> > -- > KRnet mailing list > KRnet@list.krnet.org > https://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet >
-- KRnet mailing list KRnet@list.krnet.org https://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet
