I viewed the agreement as written acknowledgement of existing copyright law, with the added restriction of 1 set of plans per plane.
Breach of contract (the agreement to build one plane per plan set) would be enforced by civil action taken by the copyright holder and beneficiary of that covenant that makes another plan sale eminent (profitable). Where breaking the agreement and thereby costing the beneficiary the loss of profit from a plans sale is the cause of the damages to the beneficiary. I am not a lawyer, but that's the impression I got from my interactions when I purchased my plan sets. I was OK with those restrictions and so accepted the conditions. My other option, I felt, was to not make the purchases. Were I to sell them I would inform the buyer of the covenant, same as I would when selling a real estate parcel encumbered by an easement. Who would make the attempt to sell without making the buyer aware of encumbrances/easements or restrictions? A civil action for damages resulting from behavior like that seems like a slam dunk in my (non lawyer) opinion. There are likely ways to get around it, ask your lawyer. But why? Maybe the plans are hard to find, but there are sets out there. Just like rare coins and lake la-4s. jg > >
-- KRnet mailing list KRnet@list.krnet.org https://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet
