I know of a crap load of airplanes with a full complement of mags and they go 
down too... If you fly, there is the chance of a malfunction, and yet we fly. 
    On Thursday, July 7, 2022 at 08:07:47 PM CDT, victor taylor via KRnet 
<[email protected]> wrote:  
 
 Hey Luis,
At Velocity we still keep one magneto on all our aircraft. I had dinner with a 
Velocity owner who had dual batteries, dual alternators and dual electronic 
ignition. I suggested that he have one magneto and he said absolutely not and 
went on to say that there was no way both systems could fail at once. Four 
months later he and his wife were coming out of Kissimmee Florida and both 
systems failed within a minute of each other. It totaled the aircraft and put 
them both in the hospital for over three months each. He is now building 
another Velocity that will have one mag and one electronic ignition. Your 
system is unlikely to fail but it’s not impossible. Magnetos are definitely old 
technology and way less efficient. But time has proven that dual mags are 
highly reliable. At the end of the day we are flying home made wooden aircraft 
with automotive based engines on many of them. It’s relatively safe but not 
quiet as safe as a certified aircraft with that 60 year old technology. How 
much “experimental” we want to fly our families in is what it all boils down 
to. 

Victor Taylor CFII


On Jul 7, 2022, at 19:09, Tony King via KRnet <[email protected]> wrote:



In addition to all the points Luis has made, pretty much every car on the road 
today has electronic ignition, with far less redundancy than Luis has outlined, 
yet ignition failures are quite rare given the number of units in operation.  
Whilst there may be more complexity, the reliability of electronic systems is 
in a whole different ball park to mechanical systems.  Of course the failure 
modes are different too, and regardless of which system(s) one chooses it's 
essential to understand and address how they might let you down.
TK
On Fri, 8 Jul 2022 at 09:21, Luis Claudio via KRnet <[email protected]> 
wrote:

 Dr. HSU, oh ye of little faith... I do suggest you look into the "SDS CP1 
electronic ignition systems". It means that I have dual independent power 
sources for controlling each independent timing computer with automatic 
customization for RPM and load (manifold pressure). The computer monitors my 
manifold pressure and smooths out the engine timing to give you the best engine 
performance on your climb or cruise. You are always one set of points or 
capacitor failure before your engine goes to hades... (you know "Hell")...
Consider this"1. The engine timing with an electronic ignition system does not 
drift from the setpoint since there is no mechanical wear and tear2. Each 
independent computer controls an independent bank of spark plugs (4 upper and 4 
lower)3. You can customize the power curve so as you climb, the computer 
compensates by adjusting your engine's timing for the best performance. 4. Two 
completely independent batteries, one acting as primary, and the other as 
backup.5. No mandatory 500 hr overhaul6. No moving parts in the whole system... 
none7. Each computer is capable of advancing or retarding the timing of your 
engine for best economy or to prevent detonation based on manifold pressure. 8. 
Lean of peak adjustments extracts all possible energy from the fuel, picking up 
a few extra knots which are lost running leaner mixtures.9. Low current draw, 
long spark duration, 4 cylinder coil pack and controller draw about 1.2 amps at 
2500 RPM. 

and there you have it...
Luis


-- 
KRnet mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet

-- 
KRnet mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet
  
-- 
KRnet mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet

Reply via email to